RE: Please review documens on IESG Agenda for January 19, 2006

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> 
> 2.1.2 Returning Item
>   o draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt
>     Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 
>     Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are 
> different solutions 
>     to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and 
> essentially "let the 
>     market decide." 
>     Token: Mark Townsley
>   o draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt
>     Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS (Proposed 
> Standard) - 2 of 2 
>     Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are 
> different solutions 
>     to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and 
> essentially "let the 
>     market decide." 
>     Token: Mark Townsley
> 
>

This is not a MIB-related question, yet I will ask it. Why did the WG
recommend to advance two documents that represent two solutions to the
same problem to Proposed, and "let the market decide" rather than
proposing them as Experimental, in a first phase, until "the market
decides"?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan