RE: defining an OID for a scalar Instance

["David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>]

HI,

Will do. Bert has previously given me a list of other changes,
and I've been too busy to work on them. Please send me any
other changes, and I'll try to roll them into the next version.

Regards,
/david t. perkins


On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> Thanks all, and thanks MIke for pointing to the earlier
> discussion. I was on a plane when asking the question and
> could not dig into the archives (plus I am lazy at that anyway).
> 
> So I will let it go for the IPSEC-SPD-MIB module.
> 
> I would like to ask/suggest that SMICng changes this to a
> Warning instead of a Error (if it wants to flag it at all).
> 
> Bert
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> > Behalf Of C. M. Heard
> > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 22:49
> > To: Mreview (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: defining an OID for a scalar Instance
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, C. M. Heard wrote:
> > > I think we must have had this discussion before [...].  If I
> > > have time I'll look in my e-mail archive to see if I can find
> > > something there.
> > 
> > And, indeed, we HAVE discuss this before.  The thread starts here:
> > 
> > http://ops.ietf.org/lists/ietfmibs/ietfmibs.2003/threads.html#00006
> > 
> > and I've attached the message that I think contains the punchline.
> > It supports the previous conclusion:
> > 
> > > In the meantime, I would say ignore the error message.
> > 
> > //cmh
> > 
>