[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MIB Doctor Last Call on 2 RADEXT MIB documents
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:00:12PM +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> Juergen, thanks ofr checking and commenting.
>
> I certainly like your style better than what is in the
> current document. But I think that at this time (after
> WG Last Call, i.e. docs being on my AD plate) we
> can only mention it to the WG, but add a note that
> we are indeed very late with this.
>
> We might actually just not say anything, because if
> we look at all the MIB modules defined sofar, these
> type of stylistic differences can be seen all over the
> place.
>
> And as you yourself once stated (I think): an OID is an OID.
>
> Now, instead of sending this as part of my AD review comments,
> maybe you can just post it to the radext WG as a gentle
> suggestion, and that way it may be received much better.
> Just thinking aloud here.
I do not see any technical reasons to hold off this document since
technically indeed, an OID is just an OID. Don't take my comment as a
last call comment requiring action in any way. Perhaps you should have
pressed delete early on when you started reading my message. ;-)
I just wanted to get feedback from doctors here on the list who might
care about style issues to see whether we have a common stylistic
preference or not.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany