[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Support for XXX OID value



HI,

We talked about in the past how to support a
"temporary OID value" for use in I-Ds. Consider:

---------------------------------------------------------
myExampleMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
    LAST-UPDATED "200604130000Z"  -- April 13, 2006
    ORGANIZATION "IETF MIB Example Working Group"
    CONTACT-INFO
                 "WG charter:
              http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mibexmpl.html
                  Mailing Lists:
                    General Discussion: mibexmpl@ietf.org
                    To Subscribe: mibexmpl-request@ietf.org
                    In Body: subscribe your_email_address
                  Chair: Dan Romascanu
                    Postal: Avaya
                            Atidim Technology Park, Bldg. 3
                            Tel Aviv 61131
                            Israel
                    Tel: +972-3-645-8414
                    E-mail: dromasca@avaya.com

                  Editor: David T. Perkins
                    Postal: SNMPinfo
                            548 QuailBrook Ct
                            San Jose, CA 95110
                            USA
                    Tel: +1-408-394-8702
                    E-mail: dperkins@snmpinfo.com"
    DESCRIPTION
        "The definitions in this MIB module are examples.

        Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This version
        of this MIB module is part of yyyy see the RFC itself for
        full legal notices.
        "
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note

    REVISION    "200604130000Z"  -- April 13, 2006
    DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC yyyy."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note

    ::= { mib-2 XXX }
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXX with IANA-assigned number & remove this note

-----------------------------------------------------------

In the above, the RFC editor notes were taken directly from
RFC 4181 ("Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents").

Did we decide whether or not that there should be a
special value (such as the XXX above) that with a
command line switch would cause a MIB parser not
to generate an error message? For example,
  mymibparser MY-EXAMPLE-MIB
might generate error
E: f(MY-EXAMPLE-MIB), (74,21) Sub-Id for item "myExampleMIB"
    must be a "number" or "name(number)"

But, with command line option, say, "--type=ID", such as:
  mymibparser --type=ID MY-EXAMPLE-MIB
would not output an error message.

Regards,
/david t. perkins