-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of jcucchiara@mindspring.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:51
To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: C. M. Heard; mreview@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Support for XXX OID value
----- Original Message -----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>
Cc: C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com>; <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: Support for XXX OID value
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:35:38AM +0300, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Better, let us 'last call' this conclusion.
Does anybody have a problem with considering that errors generated
by
myExampleMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
...
::= { mib-2 XXX }
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXX with IANA-assigned number & remove this
note
should be considered a feature and not a bug and need not be fixed
in tools and compilers recommended for MIB Reviews?
I agree that this is a feature.
Agree also.
-Joan
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen,
Germany