Re: Time to Revise the TC list

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Thu, 4 May 2006 17:29:19 +0200 , "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> said:

Bert> Not having heard much more on the below emails, I have now
Bert> updated http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-common-tcs.html
Bert> with the following additional TCs.:

I think it's important to put a piece of text in the page that
discusses what happens when a RFC with a MIB in it references another
RFC's MIB.  Specifically, that when an RFC is ready to advance and
it's waiting on TCs found in another MIB.

I believe the current accepted solution is that the RFC won't be able
to advance without splitting out the TCs into a separate document and
advancing that as well.  What I don't remember is if the new split-out
MIB needs to go to proposed first or whether it could skip to draft.
-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett