[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: initial issues
- To: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
- Subject: Re: initial issues
- From: Ben Black <ben@layer8.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:36:36 -0800
- Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:40:40 -0800
- Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Thanks for the pointer. I wonder at the fact that this is dated from
October 1999 and we are still trying to figure this out.
Ben
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:34:55PM -0500, Vijay Gill wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Ben Black wrote:
>
> > As an aside, I personally think a GSE-like approach is more realistic
> > given the views on multihoming I've seen expressed on various lists and
> > at the multi6 BoF. Why all forms of GSE were rejected in favor of the
> > obviously untenable, unsolved current state is simply beyond me.
>
> Ben, this might prove to be of interest re: GSE
>
> http://www.join.uni-muenster.de/JOIN/ipv6/drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-esd-analysis-05.txt
>
> /vijay
>