Re: initial issues

["Eliot Lear" <lear@cisco.com>]

> > I half agree with you on these points, and I might even agree with you
> > 100% depending on what you meant.  As we saw in the BoF in San Diego,
> > multihoming can mean different things to different people.
>
> Which is why a good starting point would be to gather requirements, do
> a taxonomy, etc. We need to understand what the constraints of the
> problem are before we look too much at specific approaches.

I have no problem with a taxonomy, so long as the definitions are broad
enough to allow for multiple architectures at this stage of the game.
Otherwise we are defining the solution.
And this makes me wonder whether or not a taxonomy is necessary.
Requirements are certainly necessary.