Re: Requirements for IP Multihoming Architectures

[Andrew Partan <post-multi6@partan.com>]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:18:18PM -0000, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> 1. Whilst it is possible to do multihoming/multiattaching in a DFZ friendly
> way through a single provider, it would clearly be better if the solutions
> proposed addressed both cases in a similar way rather than having two
> totally separate solutions.  Also, load balancing even to a single provider
> is still difficult to achieve.

[html ignored.]

Yes, but I would not wish to require the solution to be the same,
if the solution space is different.
	--asp