[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-00.txt



I agree 100%.  This document is not gospel, it is a starting point for
our conversation on requirements.  All components of it are subject to
revision.


Ben

>It would be unreasonable to take as accepted a requirements document
>that is less than 4 days old, no matter its content.
>--
>Eliot Lear
>lear@cisco.com