[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-00.txt



Ben;

> I agree 100%.  This document is not gospel, it is a starting point for
> our conversation on requirements.

Instead of meta discussion, can we resume technical one.

I don't think there are important points remaining.

> All components of it are subject to revision.

Of course.

However, it should be worth noting that we should first document real
world requirements and then find appropriate solutions and should not
first define the solution and then find appropriate requirements.

							Masataka Ohta