[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transport level multi-homing a structural view.
- To: multi6@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: Transport level multi-homing a structural view.
- From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 11:41:45 -0700
- Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Greg Maxwell wrote:
> [Tier 1 - providerB & TLA][Tier 1 providerC & TLA]------------------\
> | * |
> [Tier 1 - providerA & TLA][Tier 1 providerD & TLA] - [Tier 1 E ...] |
> | | | | | | | |
> \ [tier 2 A prefix ]\ | | /----------------------| | | |
> [cust sngl homed A] | || | [Tier 2 - D&E prefixes] | | |
> [multihomed cust A&D]--uu---/ | \[Cust D&E] [Cust E]---/ | |
> [cust sngl A]----------/| | /[Link Sharing cust Pre E&C] |
> [Tier 3 provider A&D&E] \[Link Sharing cust Pre C&E]--/
> [Cust A&D&E]/ \[Cust A&D&E]-----private IP level peering--/
This is of course not comprehensive, other arrangements are possible such
as customers recieveing several differnt TLA prefixes from differnt tier
2/3s.