Re: administrivia (on avoiding injury)

[Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us>]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joe Abley wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:44:27PM -0500, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > My requirement is not for transparency or for sessions to proceed
> > after a glitch. It's for the ability to open *new* sessions from hosts 
> > that have *not* been modified from RFC 2460 conformance. That's different, 
> > and essential.
> 
> Ah yes, you are right. My apologies.

Alright, assuming for the moment that totally unaltered hosts must be able
to open a new session after a glitch, is hackery an acceptible way to
accomplish this if no pretty solution presents itself?