Re: administrivia (on avoiding injury)

[Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>]

I think so greg but if we can figure it out quickly we should. 

I am feeling like all want to ship something useful quick? I can go in
that mode easily?  Then we work on stuff progressively?  

Is that our model?

/jim

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Greg Maxwell wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:44:27PM -0500, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > My requirement is not for transparency or for sessions to proceed
> > > after a glitch. It's for the ability to open *new* sessions from hosts 
> > > that have *not* been modified from RFC 2460 conformance. That's different, 
> > > and essential.
> > 
> > Ah yes, you are right. My apologies.
> 
> Alright, assuming for the moment that totally unaltered hosts must be able
> to open a new session after a glitch, is hackery an acceptible way to
> accomplish this if no pretty solution presents itself?
> 
> 
>