[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: scope of solution..

To: Bora Akyol <akyol@pluris.com>
Subject: Re: scope of solution..
From: Tony Li <tli@Procket.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>, Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:49:22 -0700
Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com



 | How many unique prefixes do we expect to see in the Internet
 | with IPv6? I thought one of the reasons why IPv6 addresses were designed
 | the way they are was for ease of aggregation. If it turns out that IPv6
 | causes the amount of unique prefixes in the forwarding (not routing)
 | tables to blow up to multiple millions or billions then we are in trouble.


We are already in trouble.  The question is whether this group can agree on
a fix and whether we can get it deployed before it becomes a disaster.

Tony

Prev by Date: Re: scope of solution..
Next by Date: Re: scope of solution..
Prev by thread: Re: scope of solution..
Next by thread: Re: scope of solution..
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread