RE: administrivia (on avoiding injury)

[Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>]

Hi Nigel,

First no reason to be sorry I am going to imply things incorrectly here
too for sure.  But now I get your point.  Thanks............

/jim

On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Nigel Bragg wrote:

> Jim,
> 
> I'm sorry if my phrasing was not clear;  I never intended to suggest
> that hosts should run routing protocols.  What I thought I suggested
> was to use the routing system to propagate failures to leaf routers
> (and then use ND :- implied).
> 
> Happy Easter,
> 
> Nigel
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Jim Bound [SMTP:seamus@bit-net.com]
> > Sent:	Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:08 PM
> > To:	Bragg, Nigel [HAL02:HA00:EXCH]
> > Cc:	Sean Doran; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject:	RE: administrivia (on avoiding injury)
> > 
> > Nigel,
> > 
> > I knew that but was trying to provide same ability to end node
> > implementations without them having to run routing protocols on their end
> > nodes. I don't think phones and other IPv6 small devices should have to
> > run BGP et al to learn of link failures.  All IPv6 nodes MUST support ND
> > and why I took that path as a brainstorm idea and its pretty lightweight
> > and fast.
> > 
> > /jim
> > 
>