[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An idea: GxSE

To: sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us
Subject: Re: An idea: GxSE
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:02:54 -0500
CC: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>, RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:09:47 -0700
Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
Organization: IBM

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> 
> >       there are a lot of IPv6 implementation already out of the door.
> >       we need to concentrate ourselves to *operational* solution that are
> >       deployable on implementation that are available today (= NO NEW CODE).
> 
> i do not believe that we will be able to produce a satisfactory
> multhoming solution without new code.

The text I suggested weeks ago for the requirements draft was
intended to specify very precisely what is and is not acceptable
in the way of new host code. When we get the requirements agreed,
we can decide which solutions are worth exploring.

   Brian

Prev by Date: Re: An idea: GxSE
Next by Date: Re: An idea: GxSE
Prev by thread: Re: An idea: GxSE
Next by thread: Re: An idea: GxSE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread