[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An idea: GxSE
- To: RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
- Subject: Re: An idea: GxSE
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 04:36:59 +0900
- Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:39:39 -0700
- Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
>> well, there are at least two.
>> draft-yu-simple-ipv6multihoming-01.txt
>> draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-01.txt
> Have read those. I don't believe either of these drafts
>"resolves the IDR routing table issues caused by multi-homing",
>and that's just for openers.
they don't require us to inject more-specific routes to worldwide
routing table, so they should be more routing-table-size friendly
than currently practiced IPv4 multihomnig.
itojun