Re: An idea: GxSE

[Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>]

could you or Paul take a stab at taking GxSE and extracting the reqs its
solves and we an put those in our reqs definition with other reqs.

I do think it wise we have reqs and then solutions.


/jim
"Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])


On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jon (Taz) Mischo wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > Randy, I suggested some very precise requirements text to take account of the
> > fact that there is a lot of running and shipped code in existing products that 
> > is simply not going to get rewritten that quickly. Like it or not, multi6
> > has to coexist with vanilla IPv6, and that generates its own set of
> > requirements.
> 
> Brian, if we can make something like GxSE work with vanilla v6, however,
> that should satisfy everyone.  Instead of clobbering the discussion, I
> think we should expand it.  There must be a happy medium.
> 
> -Taz
> 
> -- 
>         "Be liberal in what you accept,
>       and conservative in what you send.."
> --Jon Postel (1943-1998) RFC 1122, October 1989
> 
>