Re: An idea: GxSE

["Jon (Taz) Mischo" <taz@tazlore.com>]

It was Paul's idea, so initially, I'd say it would be appropriate for him
to.  I had some ideas I kind of tossed into the ring that I'd be happy to
work on, but I must defer to Paul, as it's his brainchild :)

-Taz

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jim Bound wrote:

> could you or Paul take a stab at taking GxSE and extracting the reqs its
> solves and we an put those in our reqs definition with other reqs.
> 
> I do think it wise we have reqs and then solutions.
> 
> 
> /jim
> "Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
> 
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jon (Taz) Mischo wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > 
> > > Randy, I suggested some very precise requirements text to take account of the
> > > fact that there is a lot of running and shipped code in existing products that 
> > > is simply not going to get rewritten that quickly. Like it or not, multi6
> > > has to coexist with vanilla IPv6, and that generates its own set of
> > > requirements.
> > 
> > Brian, if we can make something like GxSE work with vanilla v6, however,
> > that should satisfy everyone.  Instead of clobbering the discussion, I
> > think we should expand it.  There must be a happy medium.
> > 
> > -Taz
> > 
> > -- 
> >         "Be liberal in what you accept,
> >       and conservative in what you send.."
> > --Jon Postel (1943-1998) RFC 1122, October 1989
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
        "Be liberal in what you accept,
      and conservative in what you send."
--Jon Postel (1943-1998) RFC 1122, October 1989