Re: requirements draft revision

[Joe Abley <jabley-ietf@automagic.org>]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:24:35AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > We haven't defined a "network" in this context (I'm assuming
> > "enterprise" will do the trick; "network" hints at routing
> > solutions and we are trying to be general).
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > What do you have in mind by the "or the relationship may be indirect"
> > phrase? What particular case are you trying to accommodate?
> 
> transit providers provide transit to other transit providers.  hence the
> recursion.  hence the use of network, not enterprise.

Is a transit provider not itself an enterprise? I was assuming it
was.


Joe