[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jabley@automagic.org: unscientific multi-homing survey: results]



Joe Abley wrote:
> 
> I sent some questions about multi-homing to the nanog list earlier
> this week, and a few people replied. This is a summary.
> 
> This is extremely non-rigorous, but might give a tiny bit of
> insight into something, maybe.
...
> >  + what is *bad* about the way that multi-homing works in IPv4?

Interesting that nobody mentioned BGP table bloat, and only
a couple mentioned convergence overhead - i.e. individual ISPs are 
not caused immediate pain by the global damage.

   Brian