[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [jabley@automagic.org: unscientific multi-homing survey: results]
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> I sent some questions about multi-homing to the nanog list earlier
> this week, and a few people replied. This is a summary.
>
> This is extremely non-rigorous, but might give a tiny bit of
> insight into something, maybe.
...
> > + what is *bad* about the way that multi-homing works in IPv4?
Interesting that nobody mentioned BGP table bloat, and only
a couple mentioned convergence overhead - i.e. individual ISPs are
not caused immediate pain by the global damage.
Brian