RE: Transport level multihoming

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> 	#1 - how multihoming is done today in the Internet
> 	#2 - requirements for multihoming in an IPv6 Internet
>            (which probably should say "AT LEAST #1 and some more things")

just to make trouble, and not because i have a position on the question, is
the parenthetical above *really* a desirable/necessary condition?  i.e.  if,
by magic, we come up with a really sexy v6 solution, must it also support
current v4-style multihoming.

randy