[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Transport level multihoming

To: "Greg Maxwell" <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us>,"Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Subject: RE: Transport level multihoming
From: "Ben Black" <ben@layer8.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:54:05 -0700
Cc: "Peter Tattam" <peter@jazz-1.trumpet.com.au>,<multi6@ops.ietf.org>

>
> This working group has pretty much painted themselves into a corner by
> concluding that application level changes for multihoming support are not
> acceptable.
>

I am part of this working group and I have definitely not concluded this.
I have concluded the exact opposite, and I believe rather strongly that
the reason this situation exists is layer violation (why does the
application
need to know the network and transport addresses?).


Ben

Prev by Date: Re: Transport level multihoming
Next by Date: Re: Pseudo "last call" for draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-2260-02.txt
Prev by thread: Re: Transport level multihoming
Next by thread: RE: Transport level multihoming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread