RE: MHTP draft (draft-py-multi6-mhtp-00.txt)

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Michel Py wrote:
> >> This is handled by NATv4, at least to some extent (I'm not sure
> whether
> >> anyone has analyzed how ipv6 extension headers might affect this if
> there
> >> was NATv6), but then the MHTP would have to be fully bidirectional,
> or..?
>
> In that situation, MHTP is definitely a one-way NAT, and it does need to
> be handled. I do not intend to re-invent the wheel and I think the best
> approach here is to follow what the folks that design IPv6 NAT do.

I really hope "folks that design IPv6 NAT" was a typo or a joke.. :-)

("NATv6?  We don't need no stinkin' NATv6!" :)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords