[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BOUNCE multi6@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from [MattCrawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>]


you must post from your subscription address

randy


------- start of forwarded message -------
From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org
To: multi6-approval@psg.com
Subject: BOUNCE multi6@ops.ietf.org:    Non-member submission from [Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>]   
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 07:31:20 -0700

>From crawdad@gungnir.fnal.gov Tue Oct 23 07:31:19 2001
Received: from heffalump.fnal.gov ([131.225.9.20] helo=fnal.gov)
	by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 15w2aN-0008VW-00
	for multi6@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 07:31:19 -0700
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov ([131.225.80.1])
 by smtp.fnal.gov (PMDF V6.0-24 #37519)
 with ESMTP id <0GLN0064CXO3LN@smtp.fnal.gov> for multi6@ops.ietf.org; Tue,
 23 Oct 2001 09:31:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gungnir.fnal.gov (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f9NEVEs06712; Tue,
 23 Oct 2001 09:31:14 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:31:13 -0500
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Update to Provider Independent addressing format drafts
In-reply-to: "23 Oct 2001 08:33:03 EDT."
 <200110231233.f9NCX3P18810@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Sender: crawdad@gungnir.fnal.gov
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org, nanog@merit.edu, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com,
 ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, tech@ipv6forum.com,
 ipv6-directorate@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Message-id: <200110231431.f9NEVEs06712@gungnir.fnal.gov>

(Do so many lists really need to be cc'd?)

> > This means that giving up the lease on that single building will cause all
> > IP devices to renumber yet the costs due to the physical relocation are
> > small.
> 
> seems like a stretch.  as long as the company retained some network presence 
> in that area it should be able to keep that prefix.

It seems to me that a Wall Street prefix would not be announced by
(or accepted by peers of) an upstream provider in Chicago, or perhaps
even Connecticut.  So traffic using the Wall Street PI prefix might
actually have to be routed through some location in New York.  This
might be impractical.


------- end of forwarded message -------