[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Can we assume this it the "official" ICANN and IETF Architecture Picture ?
- To: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Fw: Can we assume this it the "official" ICANN and IETF Architecture Picture ?
- From: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:26:53 -0600
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
To: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>; "'D. J. Bernstein'" <djb@cr.yp.to>;
<ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>
Cc: <ietf-822@imc.org>; <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; "Brian E Carpenter"
<brian@hursley.ibm.com>; <lynn@icann.org>; "NCC Discuss list (E-mail)"
<discuss@icann-ncc.org>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Can we assume this it the "official" ICANN and IETF Architecture
Picture ?
> Can we assume this it the "official" ICANN and IETF Architecture Picture ?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>
> > http://unfix.org/projects/ipv6/IPv6andIPv4.gif
> >
> > It nicely (at least I hope ;) illustrates:
> > - IPv6 to IPv4 traffic using NAT-PT
> > - IPv6 in IPv4 to IPv6 traffic using 6to4 and 6in4
> > - IPv4 to IPv6 traffic using winsock5/6tunnel/...
> > - native IPv6 well duh ;)
> > - native IPv4 duh again...
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.IPv8.info
> IPv16....One Better !!
>