RE: Reqt. 3.1.1 [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments]

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

>> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> However, returning to our topic, that would make the
>> metro exchanges key failure points in the multihoming
>> system. That breaks requirement 3.1.1 in the draft.
>> Do we want to insist that the solution MUST accommodate
>> failure of metro exchanges?
> Andrew Partan wrote:
> We should insist that the solution MUST accommodate the
> failure of any single point.

We MUST, and I don't think this is even debatable.

Michel.