Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Pekka Savola
    • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Michael H. Lambert
  • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Christian Huitema
    • Re: multi-homing vs multi-connecting, Pekka Nikander
• draft-kurtis-multihoming-longprefix comments, Pekka Savola
• host or border router, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: host or border router, Peter Tattam
    • Re: host or border router, Peter Tattam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: host or border router, Tony Li
    • RE: host or border router, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: host or border router, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: host or border router, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: host or border router, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: host or border router, Tony Li
• host based MH with a connectivity cache, Peter Tattam
  • Re: host based MH with a connectivity cache, marcelo bagnulo
    • Re: host based MH with a connectivity cache, Peter Tattam
• RE: network controls are necessary, Christian Huitema
  • Re: network controls are necessary, Michael Richardson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Hain
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Hain
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: network controls are necessary, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: network controls are necessary, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Randy Bush
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
  • Re: network controls are necessary, Bill Sommerfeld
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Christian Huitema
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • Re: network controls are necessary, Bill Sommerfeld
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Hain
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Eliot Lear
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Hain
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Eliot Lear
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Li
    • Re: network controls are necessary, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: network controls are necessary, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: network controls are necessary, Michel Py
• Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Ronald van der Pol
      • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Ronald van der Pol
      • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • Re: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • same or different address block for PI? [Re: (ipv6mh) the RebelAlliance meetings in Atlanta (long)], Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: (ipv6mh) the Rebel Alliance meetings in Atlanta (long), Christian Huitema
• Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • RE: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Aldrin Isaac
    • Re: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • RE: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Aldrin Isaac
      • Re: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • RE: Multihoming and what we discussed in Atlanta, Aldrin Isaac
• Next question..., Tony Li
  • Re: Next question..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: Next question..., marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • Re: Next question..., Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: Next question..., Aldrin Isaac
      • Re: Next question..., Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: Next question..., marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: Next question..., Randy Bush
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • RE: Next question..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Next question..., Randy Bush
      • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
  • RE: Next question..., Michel Py
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Next question..., Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
  • RE: Next question..., Michel Py
    • RE: Next question..., Margaret Wasserman
      • RE: Next question..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: Next question..., Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • RE: Next question..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: Next question..., Michel Py
  • RE: Next question..., J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: Next question..., Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • Re: Next question..., Eliot Lear
      • Re: Next question..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • RE: Next question..., Tony Hain
      • RE: Next question..., Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: Next question..., J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • Re: Next question..., Eliot Lear
  • RE: Next question..., Tony Li
    • Re: Next question..., Eliot Lear
  • RE: Next question..., Michel Py
• Consensus check, Tony Li
  • Re: Consensus check, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: Consensus check, marcelo bagnulo
  • Re: Consensus check, Randy Bush
  • Re: Consensus check, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Consensus check, J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: Consensus check, marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: Consensus check, Christian Huitema
    • RE: Consensus check, Michael H. Lambert
      • RE: Consensus check, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: Consensus check, Michael H. Lambert
  • RE: Consensus check, Tony Li
  • RE: Consensus check, Tony Li
  • RE: Consensus check, Tony Li
    • RE: Consensus check, marcelo bagnulo
      • Re: Consensus check, Tim Chown
      • Re: Consensus check, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      • RE: Consensus check, Tony Hain
  • RE: Consensus check, Tony Li
    • Re: Consensus check, Joe Abley
• Router solutions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Router solutions, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • Re: Router solutions, Joe Abley
      • Re: Router solutions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Router solutions, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Router solutions, Joe Abley
    • Re: Router solutions, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Router solutions, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Site local, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Site local, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Site local, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Site local, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: Site local, Tony Li
    • Re: Site local, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Site local, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • RE: Site local, Tony Li
    • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Site local, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Site local, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • RE: Site local, Tony Li
    • Re: Site local, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Site local, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: ESP/AH, RJ Atkinson
• BGP style solutions, Peter Tattam
  • Re: BGP style solutions, Francis Dupont
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: BGP style solutions, Michel Py
    • List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, Tim Chown
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, marcelo bagnulo
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, Pekka Savola
      • Re: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, Ole Troan
      • RE: List of IPv6 multihoming drafts, marcelo bagnulo
• live data simulation., Peter Tattam
  • Re: live data simulation., Shane Kerr
  • Re: live data simulation., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, Aldrin Isaac
  • RE: A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, Aldrin Isaac
    • Re: A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, Michael Richardson
  • RE: A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, Aldrin Isaac
  • RE: A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, marcelo bagnulo
    • RE: A possible solution for source-based site-exit routing, Aldrin Isaac
• multi6 meeting (non official one), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Christian Kuhtz
    • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Vijay Gill
  • Another rebel meeting at 3.30, was: Re: My impressions of the Sundaymeetings...., Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Another rebel meeting at 3.30, was: Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Tim Chown
    • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: My impressions of the Sunday meetings...., Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• RE: network controls are neccessary, Michel Py
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: network controls are neccessary, Erik Nordmark
    • RE: network controls are necessary, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Michael Richardson
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Tony Hain
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Joel M. Halpern
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Joel M. Halpern
      • RE: network controls are necessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Eliot Lear
      • Re: network controls are necessary, Eliot Lear
  • RE: network controls are neccessary, Michel Py
• Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Aldrin Isaac
  • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Craig A. Huegen
    • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Shane Kerr
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Michael H. Lambert
  • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: network controls are neccessary, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Michael H. Lambert
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Francis Dupont
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Peter Tattam
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Aldrin Isaac
    • RE: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Erik Nordmark
      • RE: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Aldrin Isaac
  • RE: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Aldrin Isaac
  • RE: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Aldrin Isaac
  • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Scott W Brim
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Francis Dupont
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, J. Noel Chiappa
  • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls areneccessary, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: identity/location separation, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Host-based may be the way to go, but network controls are neccessary, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Unofficial multi6 meeting monday, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Requirement regarding load sharing, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: Requirement regarding load sharing, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Requirement regarding load sharing, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Requirement regarding load sharing, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Requirement regarding load sharing, Erik Nordmark
• AM / FM Internet Multi-homing, Jim Fleming
• RE: enterprise multihoming with ISP consortiums, Tony Li
• paper on end to end multihoming, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: paper on end to end multihoming, Francis Dupont
    • Re: paper on end to end multihoming, Masataka Ohta
• WG next steps, Thomas Narten
  • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: WG next steps, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: WG next steps, Eliot Lear
  • Re: WG next steps, Michael H. Lambert
    • Re: WG next steps, Tim Chown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • Re: WG next steps, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: WG next steps, Sean Doran
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • Re: WG next steps, Shane Kerr
      • RE: WG next steps, marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Peter Tattam
  • RE: WG next steps, Christian Huitema
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: WG next steps, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: WG next steps, Michael H. Lambert
      • RE: WG next steps, Aldrin Isaac
      • Re: WG next steps, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: WG next steps, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: WG next steps, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: WG next steps, Michael H. Lambert
      • Re: WG next steps, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: WG next steps, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: WG next steps, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Pekka Savola
      • Re: WG next steps, Shane Kerr
    • RE: WG next steps, marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: WG next steps, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
  • RE: WG next steps, Christian Huitema
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • RE: WG next steps, marcelo bagnulo
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: WG next steps, Michael Richardson
      • Re: WG next steps, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
    • RE: WG next steps, Peter Tattam
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • RE: WG next steps, Peter Tattam
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
  • RE: WG next steps, Christian Huitema
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Michael H. Lambert
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Eliot Lear
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • enterprise multihoming with ISP consortiums, Darrell Root
      • Re: enterprise multihoming with ISP consortiums, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: enterprise multihoming with ISP consortiums, Andrew Partan
      • Re: enterprise multihoming with ISP consortiums, Michael Richardson
  • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Tony Li
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: WG next steps, Eliot Lear
      • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: WG next steps, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
      • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
      • Re: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
    • RE: WG next steps, Robert J. Rockell
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
    • RE: WG next steps, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
    • Re: WG next steps, Andrew Partan
    • Re: WG next steps, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: WG next steps, Michel Py
• Monday noon in Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: SIP again, Christian Huitema
  • Re: SIP again, Masataka Ohta
• Note Well Statement, The IESG
• 6NET report on multihoming, Dunmore, Martin
  • Re: 6NET report on multihoming, Francis Dupont
• Multihoming and IPv6 Multicast, Michael H. Lambert
• Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Michael Richardson
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Transportzilla backwards, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Michael Richardson
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Masataka Ohta
      • The cost of privacy (was Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of privacy (was Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator), Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The cost of privacy (was Re: Notes about identifier - locatorseparator), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Craig A. Huegen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Frank Kastenholz
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Erik Nordmark
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Christian Huitema
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Michael Richardson
      • Re: PTR lookups, RJ Atkinson
    • No privacy, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Christian Huitema
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Pekka Nikander
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Christian Huitema
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • SIP again, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Christian Huitema
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Tony Li
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Michael Richardson
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Tony Li
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Christian Huitema
    • Re: Notes about identifier - locator separator, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Tony Li
    • RE: Notes about identifier - locator separator, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Get together in Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: GSE, RJ Atkinson
  • Re: GSE, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: GSE, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: GSE, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: GSE, Robert J. Rockell
    • 8+8 and locator based approaches, Masataka Ohta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • RE: GSE, Greg Maxwell
    • RE: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: GSE, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • RE: GSE, Greg Maxwell
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
  • Re: GSE, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • Re: GSE, RJ Atkinson
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • RE: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: GSE, Thomas Narten
  • Re: GSE, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • RE: GSE, Tony Hain
      • RE: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • Not GSE, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: GSE, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: GSE, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: GSE, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • Re: GSE, Michael Richardson
    • Re: GSE, Alan Barrett
  • RE: GSE, Tony Li
    • Re: GSE, Eliot Lear
• status update (was Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt), Sean Doran
  • Re: status update (was Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt), Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
  • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
  • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Randy Bush
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Randy Bush
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Randy Bush
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Revised e2e multihoming ID, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: Revised e2e multihoming ID, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Revised e2e multihoming ID, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], David Conrad
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Aldrin Isaac
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michael H. Lambert
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • identifier uniqueness, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: identifier uniqueness, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: identifier uniqueness, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: identifier uniqueness, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Aldrin Isaac
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Hain
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Tony Li
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Masataka Ohta
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
    • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], RJ Atkinson
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Pekka Savola
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Peter Tattam
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
    • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Peter Tattam
  • RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Michel Py
• I-D ACTION:draft-van-beijnum-multi6-isp-int-aggr-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Pekka Savola
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Tony Li
  • RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Michel Py
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt, Michel Py
• Transport multihoming, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Transport multihoming, Peter Tattam
    • Re: Transport multihoming, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Peter Tattam
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Manuel Urueña Pascual
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Manuel Urueña Pascual
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Manuel Urueña Pascual
      • Re: Transport multihoming, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Transport multihoming, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Manuel Urueña Pascual
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Manuel Urueña Pascual
      • Re: Transport multihoming, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: Transport multihoming, Feico Dillema
  • Re: Transport multihoming, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: Transport multihoming, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Transport multihoming, Greg Maxwell
    • Re: Transport multihoming, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment, Michel Py
• RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment, Michel Py
  • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment, Randy Bush
• RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: The term multihoming, Rick Summerhill
• Agenda for Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Agenda for Atlanta, RJ Atkinson
    • What happens next? was: Re: Agenda for Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: Agenda for Atlanta, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Agenda for Atlanta, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Sean Doran
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Joe Abley
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Michael Richardson
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Craig A. Huegen
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, RJ Atkinson
• Advancement: ready to test consensus? (was: Re: The state of ...), Sean Doran
  • Re: Advancement: ready to test consensus? (was: Re: The state of ...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Requirements, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Eliot Lear
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Requirements draft, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael Richardson
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Savola
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Savola
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Shane Kerr
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • Path selection by hosts, shudder [was: Re: The state of...], Simon Leinen
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael Richardson
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Robert J. Rockell
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael H. Lambert
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Eliot Lear
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Christian de Larrinaga
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tim Chown
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael H. Lambert
      • The term multihoming [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Savola
      • Re: The term multihoming, Michael H. Lambert
      • Re: The term multihoming, Rick Summerhill
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
    • Agenda [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tim Chown
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Christian de Larrinaga
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Randy Bush
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Christian de Larrinaga
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Mark Smith
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael Richardson
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Recommendation v Requirements [Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Randy Bush
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Savola
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Savola
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Robert J. Rockell
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Greg Maxwell
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Shane Kerr
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael H. Lambert
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tim Chown
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael H. Lambert
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development], Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, J. Noel Chiappa
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Sean Doran
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, RJ Atkinson
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, RJ Atkinson
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michael H. Lambert
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Shane Kerr
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Craig A. Huegen
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Nikander
  • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • End-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • [Hipsec] End-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), jh
      • Re: [Hipsec] End-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihomingdevelopment), Masataka Ohta
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The state ofIPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), Peter Tattam
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), Peter Tattam
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), Peter Tattam
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development), Peter Tattam
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: The cost of crypto in end-host multi-homing (was Re: The stateof IPv6 multihoming development), Pekka Nikander
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, marcelo bagnulo
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Christian Kuhtz
      • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Hain
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Peter Tattam
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
    • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Tony Li
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Michel Py
    • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development, Masataka Ohta
• (ipv6mh) about MHAP draft, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: (ipv6mh) about MHAP draft, Michel Py
    • Re: (ipv6mh) about MHAP draft, Joe Abley
• multihomed host, Yoshihiro Ohba
  • Re: multihomed host, Margaret Wasserman
    • Re: multihomed host, Yoshihiro Ohba
    • Re: multihomed host, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: multihomed host, William Waites
      • Re: multihomed host, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: multihomed host, William Waites
      • Re: multihomed host, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: multihomed host, Erik Nordmark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: multihomed host, Michel Py
    • Re: multihomed host, Bill Sommerfeld
    • Re: multihomed host, Yoshihiro Ohba
      • Re: multihomed host, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: multihomed host, Yoshihiro Ohba
  • RE: multihomed host, Michel Py
  • RE: multihomed host, Ragib, Husain B (UMKC-Student)
  • RE: multihomed host, Michel Py
  • RE: multihomed host, Hesham Soliman (EAB)
• Re: Multihoming Issues, Brian E Carpenter
• Nomcom call for volunteers, Phil Roberts
• draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Sean Doran
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Dave Wilson
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Dave Wilson
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Sean Doran
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Tony Hain
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Masataka Ohta
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Eric Gauthier
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Joe Abley
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Tony Hain
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Tim Chown
      • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Sean Doran
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Masataka Ohta
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Sean Doran
  • Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03, Sean Doran
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?UmU6IFtNdWx0aWhvbWluZyCw+sGmXSA0wvcgyLjAx7fP?=, Jaehoon Jeong
  • =?UTF-8?Q?Re:=5F[Multihoming=5F=3DEA=3DB3=3DBC=3DEC=3DA0=3D9C]=5F?==?UTF-8?Q?4=3DEC=3DB0=3DA8=5F=3DED=3D9A=C2=8C=EC=9D=98=EB=A1=9D?=, Joe Abley
• revised requirements draft, Joe Abley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • revised requirements draft, Joe Abley
    • Re: revised requirements draft, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Michel Py
  • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Peter Tattam
• Multihoming draft from IPng wg, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Multihoming draft from IPng wg, Tim Chown
  • Re: Multihoming draft from IPng wg, Bob Hinden
• Updates to draft-hain-ipv6-pi-addr*, Tony Hain
  • RE: Updates to draft-hain-ipv6-pi-addr*, Tony Hain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Updates to draft-hain-ipv6-pi-addr*, Michel Py
• (multi6) New MHTP draft., Michel Py
• updated text SCTP Multihoming issues, Coene Lode
• RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP multihoming issues draft, Coene Lode
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP multihoming issues draft, Coene Lode
• BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Daniel Hagerty
    • Re: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Michel Py
  • RE: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Christian Huitema
    • RE: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Scott Brim
  • Re: BALTS: Better At Least Than Singlehomed, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits w/1.09, Michel Py
  • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed editsw/1.09, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Sean Doran
  • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Tony Hain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Christian Huitema
    • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Tony Hain
    • Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Joe Abley
      • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Tony Hain
  • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Sean Doran
    • RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting], Tony Hain
• SCTP multihoming issues draft, Coene Lode
  • Re: SCTP multihoming issues draft, Tim Chown
  • Re: SCTP multihoming issues draft, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SCTP multihoming issues draft, Coene Lode
  • RE: SCTP multihoming issues draft, Coene Lode
    • RE: SCTP multihoming issues draft, Pekka Savola
• (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Sean Doran
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Sean Doran
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
    • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Vijay Gill
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Sean Doran
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
    • Re: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Joe Abley
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
    • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Daniel Hagerty
    • Re: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, RJ Atkinson
    • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Randy Bush
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
    • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Daniel Hagerty
  • RE: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, Michel Py
    • Re: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting, RJ Atkinson
• (multi6) Requirement documents: edits v 1.08, Michel Py
• (multi6) Possible new requirement: PA address filtering, Michel Py
• Requirements document: edits v 1.07, Michel Py
• Requirements documents: edits v 1.06, Michel Py
  • Re: Requirements documents: edits v 1.06, RJ Atkinson
    • Re: Requirements documents: edits v 1.06, Eliot Lear
• RE: Need for N-homedness (was Re: asymmetric routing), Michel Py
• (multi6) It's all about timing. The deadline to submit for Minneapolis is in six weeks., Michel Py
• Requirements document edit 1.05, Michel Py
• RE: Most recent version (of requirements doc edits) is 1.04, Michel Py
• (multi6) the nonsense paragraph is back, Michel Py
  • Most recent version?, Alex Zinin
• (multi6) Requirements document edit 1.04, Michel Py
• (multi6) more control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Michel Py
• (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Michel Py
  • RE: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Tony Hain
  • Re: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Masataka Ohta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Sean Doran
    • "ONE single routing system for everyone using IPv6?", Jim Fleming
  • RE: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Michel Py
  • RE: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Michel Py
    • Re: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Masataka Ohta
      • Re: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Pekka Savola
      • Re: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Masataka Ohta
  • RE: (multi6) control / load balancing of ingress traffic., Michel Py
• RE: (multi6) Requirement document last edit 1.03, Michel Py
• RE: (multi6) Requirement document last edit 1.02, Michel Py
• (multi6) Requirements document last call / edit v1.01, Michel Py
• (multi6) Requirement document last call /edit (let's focus!), Michel Py
  • Re: (multi6) Requirement document last call /edit (let's focus!), RJ Atkinson
    • Re: (multi6) Requirement document last call /edit (let'sfocus!), Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: (multi6) Requirement document last edit, RJ Atkinson
• Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Christian Huitema
  • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Eliot Lear
    • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Vijay Gill
      • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Eliot Lear
      • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Vijay Gill
  • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Jim Fleming
  • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Tony Hain
    • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Masataka Ohta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Michel Py
    • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Tony Hain
    • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Masataka Ohta
      • Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Michel Py
    • load balancing [Re: Requirement document last call (let's focus!)], Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Tony Hain
      • "The vast majority of the traffic flows", Jim Fleming
  • RE: Requirement document last call (let's focus!), Michel Py
• Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Alex Zinin
  • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draftcomments], David Conrad
    • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Alex Zinin
      • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Jim Fleming
      • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michel Py
    • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draftcomments], David Conrad
      • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Alex Zinin
    • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Alex Zinin
  • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Sean Doran
    • Remember that this WG is charterd to solve SITE multihoming, Jim Fleming
    • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Alex Zinin
  • RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michel Py
  • RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michel Py
  • RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michel Py
    • Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michael Richardson
  • RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments], Michel Py