Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments]

[Alex Zinin <azinin@nexsi.com>]

>> This would be better answered by the chairs, but I
>> personally think that multihoming for mobile IPv6 is out of scope
>> here.

> While I tend to agree that it is out of scope for the working group, I
> personally see multi-homing, mobility, and renumbering as facets of the same
> problem, namely the use of the end point identifier as the routing locator.
> A solution that addresses (pun intended) the multi-homing requirement may
> also address the mobility/renumbering problem.

Agree completely.

Alex.