Re: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments]

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

Alex Zinin wrote:
> 
> David,
...
> Agree. That's why I think DNS should provide DN->EID mapping where
> EID should stay static regardless of the nodes's location/connectivity,
> and this is the EID->locator (routing name) mapping that should account
> for dynamic changes in it.

This sounds exactly like a description of mobility, and exactly like
a description of multihoming. I don't think we should be scared of
common solutions (which is not the same as saying MIPv6 is the
solution for multihoming).

   Brian