RE: Missing DNS reqt? [was Re: (multi6) requirements draft comments]

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

>> Michel Py wrote:
>> The reason I kept centrally assigned PI addresses (1) is market
>> reality. Whatever we do, there will always be some people that will
>> get their prefix advertised into the DFZ. Instead of putting our eads
>> in the sand and pretend it will never happen, let's state that it
>> should be reserved to large multinational corporations and put a
>> very high price and hassle to get one of these and let's not make it
>> part of the DFZ but rather keep it separate (in the MHTP routing
table).

> Michael Richardson wrote:
> Why "corporations" here?
> Why not "organizations"?
> Certainly the "Mars Colony" would have a very clear reason to
> have something in the DFZ.

Agreed, "organizations" is much better.
Michel.