Re: (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 10:19 , Michel Py wrote:
>> Normally an IETF document is not ready for WG Last Call until
>> after the document has all updates and stops changing for
>> weeks/months.
>
> Maybe this needs to be balanced with the fact that this workgroup
> has not reached any of the milestones mentioned in its charter
> since London.

I'm hard pressed to think of ANY IETF WG that met its milestones.
I'm not saying that missing milestones is good, but rather that
missing milestones is not, by itself, unusual.

IMHO, procedurally we need to get the document edited to reflect
the changes currently circulating (provided no one on the list
objects at this point to the proposed changes), then determine
that no more changes are appropriate, then do a WG Last Call.

And I think all that is possible to resolve via email on the list,
which seems to be the chair's preferred approach.

Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com