[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
From: Joe Abley <jabley@nlri.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:30:14 -0500
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>, Sean Doran <smd@ab.use.net>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3C638B84.D017AB2E@hursley.ibm.com>
References: <F66A04C29AD9034A8205949AD0C9010401C0E491@win-msg-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <3C638B84.D017AB2E@hursley.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I agree with Christian. I'd also like to see a complete new draft ASAP,
> since it will be less confusing than this discussion.

I also think that incorporating my interpretation of michael's edit
list into a fresh rev would give us something concrete to argue about.

Does that make five?

Joe

References:
- RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
  - From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
- Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: SCTP multihoming issues draft
Next by Date: RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed editsw/1.09
Previous by thread: Re: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
Next by thread: RE: please indicate whether you are content with the proposed edits [was: : (multi6) 53rd IETF Meeting]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread