Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Sean;

>    Joe has done some updates to the draft, and has been met with
> silence from the WG.
> 
>    Would anyone like to comment on draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-03?

I agree with Brian;

	My opinion: ship it. We need to get done with requirements so that
	we can proceed to look at solutions. Twiddling the requirements to
	achieve universal consensus isn't productive.

>    (Remember this is a gating issue, as this document will be used
> within the working group when evaluating proposed multihoming solutions,
> so this draft is important, and deserving of a few minutes of reading
> and commenting time).

However, the result based not on the universal consensus should not
be used to evaluate proposals.

IMHO, in other words, attempts to ship requirement drafts was not
productive.

Simply listing up all the requirements, some of which contradicts
each other, could have been a better approach, as the result
contains contradicting ones, anyway.

						Masataka Ohta