[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multihomed host
>>> "Iljitsch" == Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> writes:
Iljitsch> There is one difference that may be important sometimes,
Iljitsch> but inconsequential at other times: a host can detect
Iljitsch> that an interface is down. It can't necessarily detect
Iljitsch> the link to an ISP is down.
But the "physical interface is down" failure mode is relatively rare
-- as soon as an ethernet switch, or ethernet to atm or mpls bridge
is thrown into the mix, the "physical interface is up but link layer
is down" failure mode becomes much more common. In fact it subsumes
the first case since if there's no physical interface, there's no link
layer.
Is the correct place to implement detection of these types of failures
in the link layer? But then the providers have to play nicely, and it
says nothing about problems more than one hop out in the ISP's
network. Or beyond the ISP's AS even...
I guess I am not sure where in the stack the failure detection
belongs, or which types of failures are to be addressed here...
-w
--
William Waites <ww@styx.org> Any sufficiently advanced
Idiosyntactix Research Laboratories technology is indistinguishable
http://www.irl.styx.org from a rigged demo.