Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>]

    > From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@cisco.com>

    >> there are a number of basically feasible paths you can take to support
    >> *widescale* multi-homing.
    >> First, you can use multiple connectivity-based addresses. .. Second,
    >> you can re-use a mobility mechanism. Third, you could  use a radical
    >> addressing architecture that assigns addresses automatically, based
    >> on actual connectivity topology.

    >> I don't know of any others. Do you?

    > Given those three and those three only 

Hey, I did ask if you know of any others. I'd be very interested in any
additional alternatives you can outline. (Excluding schemes of the form "let
the routing do it", like the existing IPv4 solution, and PI addresses.)

	Noel