RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

[smd@ab.use.net (Sean Doran)]

[broken record alert]

Craig:

| * simple to implement and operate for the enterprise
| * network infrastructure visibility into alternative paths such that
|   policy decisions may be made on paths by the infrastructure, not the
|   host
| * unique, host-aware end-to-end addresses so poorly-written applications
|   (in use in IPv4 today) will work

Great.  Perhaps you can suggest some text that could
be incorporated into the requirements draft, if you
think these points are not already there?  

Even a paragraph or two elaborating each point would be useful.

The WG is here to discuss any text you come up with.

	Sean.