RE: The state of IPv6 multihoming development

["Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>]

|   What a stupid suggestion.


Thank you for your opinion.

   
|   It makes the border router the single point of failure totally
|   destroying the benefit of multihoming.


Or.... you could use multiple border routers.  

   
|   If you try to have multiple border routers with complex redundancy
|   protocol, there always is simple failure mode of the protocol.


Yes, but you don't NEED a complex redundancy protocol.  You only need
the group of border routers to make a consistent decision about the
optimal exit route.  We have a tool that does this already.  ;-)

Tony