RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Brian E Carpenter
> The problem with this (and the reason I have serious
> doubts about Tony's PI proposal, and all geographical
> proposals going back at least to Bill Simpson's metro
> proposal years ago), is there is no economic reason to
> create such an exchange.

No disagreement here. We are talking about geo PI that does not require
exchanges.

Michel.