Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-04.txt

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

On Wednesday, Oct 30, 2002, at 04:25 America/Montreal, Iljitsch van 
Beijnum wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>
> > > 2 Normativity removed (Brian E Carpenter)
> > I actually object to this change.  It is *desirable* that approaches
> > which substantially don't meet the requirements get disallowed.
> The IETF doesn't get to disallow things.
IETF WGs have used requirements documents to disallow proposals for 
years,
not sure why you have concluded otherwise.

> > That is in fact the main reason for doing requirements in the first
> > place.
> I'm missing the part where you say what should be in the requirements
> instead.
I've made numerous comments on the requirements draft over the life of 
this WG,
as the archives clearly show.  Not sure how you missed all of them,
but checking the WG archives should reveal them all.

Ran