RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]

["Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>]

|   > >  It is also desireable for backup
|   > > purposes but I feel this isn't an important enough 
|   reason to allow it.
|   
|   > Backup is a big driver for current multihomed customers.
|   > Disallowing that really reduces the applicability of an approach.
|   
|   I don't mean that these people shouldn't have backups. What 
|   I mean is
|   that injecting a globally visible route into the 
|   infrastructure 100% of
|   the time to avoid sub-optimal, but otherwise functional 
|   routing 1% of
|   the time isn't a good use of scarce resources.


We might well be in violent agreement.  

Are you suggesting that we disallow the globally visible
route?  Or that we disallow them from making multiple
connections?

Tony