[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]

To: multi6@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:45:13 -0500
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu

    > From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>

    > operational issues in the edge enterprise space favor provider
    > independence for maximum flexibility.

No doubt operational issues in the edge enterprise space would favor
perpetual motion machines - if they existed.

	Noel

Follow-Ups:
- RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
  - From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
Next by Date: RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
Previous by thread: RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
Next by thread: RE: PI/metro/geo [Re: The state of IPv6 multihoming development]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread