[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSE

To: Tony Li <Tony.Li@procket.com>
Subject: Re: GSE
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:08:21 -0800
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <D2EC481073504E498A8DB9C0687E8CAF04D2257C@EXCHANGE0-0.na.procket.com>
References: <D2EC481073504E498A8DB9C0687E8CAF04D2257C@EXCHANGE0-0.na.procket.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

[I missed what Tony is replying to...]

Tony Li wrote:

| How about a 128-bit number, derived from some convenient
| nearby landmark,
| or cross street?

Well, if you use a 128 bit number, then you have no room left
for the locator.

This presumes the two are in the current IP address, as opposed to something above. One could go with something like HIP...

Eliot

References:
- RE: GSE
  - From: "Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>

Prev by Date: RE: GSE
Next by Date: Note Well Statement
Previous by thread: RE: GSE
Next by thread: Get together in Atlanta
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread