RE: WG next steps

["marcelo bagnulo" <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>]

Hello Shane,

>
> There are also people interested in attacking it via transport
> solutions.  I guess you could call SCTP or HIP "virtual topologies",
> but I wouldn't.
>
Do you think that HIP is a transport solution?

In more general terms, identifier-locator mapping function belongs to the
network layer or to the transport layer?

My guess is that this feature should be common to all transport layers and
that transport layers should only deal with identifiers. I mean, only the
network layer have to deal with locators.

Regards, marcelo