RE: WG next steps

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Pekka Savola wrote:
> Depending on the level of cooperation.
> If the ISP's customer sets a requirement for some kind of
> co-operation (like accepting a more specific route from the
> competetitive ISP) or else chooses another ISP, the ISP
> would have every reason to co-operate (within  reasonable
> limits, as said) with its competitors.

3.2.6 Cooperation between Transit Providers
   A multihoming strategy MAY require cooperation between a site and its
   transit providers, but MUST NOT require cooperation (relating
   specifically to the multihomed site) directly between the transit
   providers.

Michel.