RE: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

Tim,

>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Someone please debunk me if I'm wrong, but I think that swamp
>> space was allocated without the current restrictions of either
>> having a distinct routing policy or being multihomed. This means
>> that they are a few guys that still have swamp space (a class C,
>> for the most part) and don't have an AS. These guys are not
>> multihomed, they just have their ISP announce their swamp prefix
>> and have the luxury of switching ISPs without renumbering, which
>> is exactly what PI is about: one _OWNS_ the address.

> Tim Chown wrote:
> And presumably these are a bigger hit on the DFZ routing table
> size than multihomers?

I don't think so, it more a matter of creating the precedent then real
savings on the routing table size.

Michel.