[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers

To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:19:01 +0100
Cc: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3E5B7D11.3090106@cisco.com>

So what I'm getting from this discussion is that 8+8 is too late but 16+16 is too large??? I would agree that 16+16 is too large. How about 4+16?

I am still curious as to why people think that 16+16 would be any different to 8+8.

- kurtis -

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Headers
Next by Date: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Previous by thread: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Next by thread: Re: Draft: PI addressing derived from AS numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread