RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

["Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>]

> Tim Chown wrote:
> Given the 6+ hours of ipv6mh sessions in Atlanta, I see
> no problem filling a 1 hour (or more) slot with multi6
> discussion. There have been at least 1,000 posts to ipv6mh
> (and multi6) since Atlanta.   So I would not be worried
> at all about running out of steam inside an hour :)
> Of course a productive meeting is another matter. That
> means we have to approve or ditch the requirements draft,
> approve a new charter, and get real progress moving...

Exactly, but what makes you think that there has been changes WRT to
this?

Michel.