[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:09:13 +0100
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200303122313.IAA20104@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Are you saying it already belongs to where it belongs that there
should be no BoF?

I am saying that address registration and allocation/assignment
management belongs with the RIRs.

How, do you think, it should be managed?

"just like IPv4" is not an answer.

And your suggestion is?

- kurtis -

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

References:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread